This chapter is apparently the brief interlude in the Joseph story. Like a commercial for how to properly be a brother-in-law back in the day. It even came at the proper dramatic TV moment where Joseph had just been sold into slavery... (Insert Law & Order dun-dun noise here).
We launch immediately into Judah's family and offspring. Remember Judah? The brother that suggested they sell Joseph instead of just leaving him for dead. Well, God smites Judah's firstborn, Er, for being wicked, and then Er's brother Onan didn't fulfill his brother-in-law duties of sleeping with Er's widow Tamar... so Onan also feels the mortal wrath. Judah tells Tamar to go back and live with her father because, well, my footnote says it so brilliantly, "Judah effectively consigns Tamar to oblivion."
Then Judah's wife dies. This one's natural though, no smiting needed. After the appropriate time of mourning, Judah finally goes to shear his sheep. Yep. Anyways, when Tamar hears this, she takes off her widow's wear, puts on a fancy veil, and goes and sits along the road that Judah will be travelling to go...shear his sheep. When Judah happens across cloaked and veiled Tamar, he thinks she's a temple prostitute. Fans of the show Firefly would also call her a Companion. The Hebrew word for it literally translates to "sacred woman." Anyways, when he propositions her, and has no immediate payment, she suggests a few things she can hold for collateral until she gets her baby goat as payment, specifically his signet, cord, and staff. Time passes, sex is had, and Judah sends along that baby goat with someone to look for the "prostitute." Because Tamar was not actually a Companion, none can be found!
More time passes. Three months to be exact, and Judah is told that Tamar has been whoring and is preggers "as a result of her whoredom" (Gen 38:24). Clearly, this means she needs to get burned at the stake. Can I pause here to acknowledge again that the Bible uses the word "whoredom?" Okay. So at this point, Tamar brings out Judah's stuff, and he's all embarrassed that he slept with his daughter-in-law. It does, however, legitimize her pregnancy. Yay for not getting burned at the stake! Eventually, Tamar goes into labor and has twins. The firstborn actually ends up as the second born... it's a little weird. Either way, my footnotes tell me that this whole little interrupting story line is important because Tamar's son Perez (the eventual first born) begets the line of King David. If you don't already know: King David is kind of a big deal.
<3 Agnostic in the Pews
Join me as I read the NRSV Bible, Genesis to Revelations, from an open-minded, non-Christian perspective.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Joseph and the Technicolor Robe of Sibling Rivalry (Gen 37)
Now that Jacob has finally settled down in the land of
Canaan, we move on to his sons. Joseph specifically. You know him. The
seventeen year old spoiled tattle-tale.
He was the youngest, and so most loved by Jacob. Fancy robe and
everything. Here the main text calls it a “long robe with sleeves” but
footnotes also translate it as the more familiar coat of many colors. No matter
what his coat looked like, his brothers hated him and his swanky duds. Joseph
did incredibly little to ease sibling tensions. He had a few dreams in which
his whole family bowed down to him as their ruler, first wheat based then
astronomically. Needless to say, his brothers hated him even more for these
dreams. I mean, seriously. Wouldn’t you? Jacob, however, knows a thing or two
about prophetic type dreams and doesn't dismiss it out of hand.
One day, Jacob tells Joseph to go check on his brothers who
were tending the sheep, probably because he knew Joseph would tattle if they
were doing anything untoward. As it turns out, his brothers had moved the flock…
Not that Joseph gets the chance to say anything about it. They see him coming, and they start plotting
to murder him. Serious sibling rivalry indeed. One brother, Reuben, pauses the
bloody train of thought. He persuades the other brothers to just throw Joseph
in a pit alive, instead of killing him and then throwing him in the pit. When
they agree, he apparently leaves (if only because later in the chapter he comes
back). Joseph comes up, they strip him
of his fancy robe with sleeves, throw him in a pit, and sit down for lunch. All
that plotting to kill your own brother must stir up an appetite. While they’re grubbing, a caravan comes along.
One brother named Judah was apparently a Ferengi in another life because he
starts looking for the profit in the situation.
He convinces the others to sell their brother to the caravan for 20
pieces of silver. Now how to explain all of this to dear old dad who loved the
youngest son most of all? Fake Joseph’s death of course. The brothers took the
robe, shred it, douse it in goat blood, and allow Jacob to draw his own
conclusions. Meanwhile, Joseph has been
sold again to Pharaoh’s captain of the guard.
Okay. So parent-child favoritism is really bad. This is not
the first story from Genesis displaying this. It makes me wonder how prevalent
an issue this really was…or is. We’ve also got sibling rivalry blown out of
proportion yet again. Now, I’ve got
sisters. And as kids we fought. Okay, that may be an understatement. There were
occasional mini-world-wars in our household. Did we ever beat on each other and
plot to ruin each other’s lives? Sure. Plot to murder? I don’t think so. At
least I didn’t. My sisters may tell you a different story, but rest assured
ladies, I was never actually going to kill you. Maybe it’s different with
brothers? Probably not that
different. Eventually everyone grows up, moves out, and you realize that you
can actually be friends with the people you have all of these shared
experiences with. I know it doesn’t always work out that way, but it’s nice
when it does. Growing up, I never
thought I’d be friends with my sisters. Not in a million years. I wouldn’t
trade them for anything now.
<3 Agnostic in the Pews
Thursday, December 12, 2013
Jacob Finally Goes Home (Gen 35-36)
God tells Jacob to go home.
Shows up out of nowhere and tells him to go back to Bethel, put away any
other gods, clean up, and go home. Jacob’s been away for a long time. In fact,
he hasn’t been home since he stole Esau’s birthright and ran away. I don’t know
about you, but I don’t think I’d be too keen on going home after that…
ever. But the ever dutiful Jacob does as
he’s told. When he gets there, he gets a new name: Israel. He also gets the promises
his father and grandfather got. You remember. Land abounding, offspring kings
of nations. I believe it a little more now that he’s also called Israel,
though.
As soon as all of that happens, they leave again, even
though the deal was to settle in Bethel, and Rachel was the most pregnant. So
pregnant, that she went into labor on the journey to their next destination
(Ephrath). She bore a son whom she named
Ben-oni (lit. “Son of my sorrow”), and died. Jacob instead calls him Benjamin
(lit. “Son of the South”), taking away the tragic element of his name and
making it geographically based. They bury Rachel in the small town they were in
and mark the site with a pillar. Some podunk little town called Bethlehem that
no one has ever heard of…
Eventually Jacob/Israel (because this time the name change
is more of an add-on than a real replacement) catch up with Isaac who promptly
dies at 180 years old. Good timing. The bible doesn’t go into it at all, but
Jacob and Esau bury their father together, hatchet apparently buried too. Esau
is theoretically totally cool now. I mean, his little brother only stole his
birthright, ran away, and didn’t come back for like, a whole lifetime, but we’re
apparently just letting bygones be bygones. Props Esau for finding your inner
peace. Care to share with the class how you did it? No? I’m sure it could help
out. Or maybe you’re still bitter and that’s why you don’t want to talk about
it. Or at all.
Chapter 36 (yep! Two whole chapters today!) is just a
listing of Esau’s descendants which will eventually get added into that
handy-dandy biblical family tree. Mostly the important thing here is that
Jacob/Israel’s sons are (wait-for-it) Israelites. Esau’s spawn are Canaanites
because his wives were Canaanites. But yeah… genealogy is the entirety of
Chapter 36.
<3 Agnostic in the Pews
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Rape and Retribution (Genesis 34)
Okay, so since we last heard from Jacob, a lot of time
passed, and his kids are all grown up now. Dinah, Leah and Jacob’s daughter,
goes out into the world, gets seen by a prince named Shechem, and promptly
raped by him. Raped. The next few verses talk about Shechem’s feelings for
Dinah as love. “He loved the girl, and spoke tenderly to her” and he essentially
commands that she will be his wife (Gen 34:3). Jacob “held his peace” until his
sons come back from the field, and when they do, they are appropriately
outraged that their sister has been defiled “for such a thing ought not to be
done” (Gen 34:4, 7). The king (Hamor)
and prince keep trying to get Dinah and the other Israelite women to become
their wives, at whatever the price of the dowry. Jacob’s sons then decide to
have a little fun with them, saying that unless all the men are circumcised,
they will not be of one people, and they could never marry their women. And
what do Hamor and Shechem do? The get together all the men in the city, and
everyone gets circumcised… seems a little extreme, but okay. But while all the
newly snipped men are still recovering, Dinah’s brothers go kill everyone, and
Jacob’s other sons go and loot everything. Retribution. Then Jacob reprimands
his sons for their behavior, and we’re left with his sons questioning back “Should
our sister be treated like a whore?” (Gen 34:31).
I have serious mixed feelings about this. In part, this just
disgusts me. Dinah gets no voice of her
own. Absolutely none. She’s talked about more as an object than a person.
Granted, this is the Old Testament, written by stodgy old men in a time where
women were property, not people. But still!! Then if that’s not enough, the
fact that Shechem talks about his abounding love for Dinah after raping her
just about made me throw the book across the room. Rape is a power trip, not
love. Love has already been given some good precedents, like Jacob working forever
to earn the hand of Rebekah, and this feels like it’s undermining all of that.
Moving on from the actual rape and theoretical motivations
for it… Jacob and his sons’ reactions. I appreciate the justified anger of
Jacob’s sons. They are legitimately outraged, and completely justified in it. But Jacob gives no guidance here. He just stays quiet until after his sons have
incapacitated then murdered everyone. Now, I’m sure he wasn’t told the whole
plan, but he could have pre-empted the entire situation by ending it as head of
household before letting his sons meddle. And after it’s all over, he yells at
them, trying to guide after the fact, but it just confuses his morally loose
sons. It leaves them wondering how to let their sisters, wives, and daughters
be treated at all.
We live in a culture that teaches to not get raped, instead
of teaching not to rape. There are people in the world who honestly believe
that “legitimate rape” causes a woman’s body to shut down and therefore not
become pregnant because of it. While this stems from a debate about abortion,
the idea is out there, and the rapists get latent sympathy. We are self-aware
enough as a society, however, to know the attitude about rape, but instead of
helping to solve the problem, it perpetuates it. Every so often, you’ll hear a story about a
girl who cries rape, but she consented, regretted, and knew she could take
advantage of the system in place. I wish
I had some nugget of wisdom to add here about how we are continuing to grow and
evolve. About how at least women aren’t actually property anymore. About how
overzealous justice can still teach us something. But I don’t. The whole thing just makes me
sick to my stomach.
<3 Agnostic in the Pews
Monday, December 9, 2013
New Year, New Beginning
Second week of Advent. Second week in the church year. I
thought really hard about coming back last week. New year, new start and all
that jazz. It would’ve been a nice touch, and I honestly don’t know why I
didn’t get my ass in gear. This whole
season is full of beginnings and endings though. The winter solstice marks the
longest night, the end of the darkness and the return of the light. Second
chances and starting overs will happen ad nauseum at the turn of the year. I’m
going to get one in now.
My longtime silence here can be explained very easily: I got
bored. It’s a roadblock that I’d been warned about, especially trying to read
the Bible the way I was going to. To be fair, I did have a fairly busy stretch
in that boredom that I might’ve warned you about otherwise… But really, I just
got bored. So I’m going to try something
else. I’m going to actually go through that listing at the front of the bible
I’ve got that wasn’t my mother’s. When I
hit passages I’ve already covered here, I’ll note when they’re recommended to
be read, but I’m going to skip right over reading it a second time. I’m hoping
that with the skipping around, I won’t get as bored, and I’ll be able to more
easily talk about deeper issues than whose ancestors are whose. It looks like I’ve got a few chapters of
Genesis left to go before the Old Testament lets up for a little while, but now
that I’ve got a check list that I can mark off chapters… I’ll feel slightly
more accomplished and stick with it.
Like adding smaller and fun things to a to-do list.
And really? Comment. I want some discussion. Disagree with
me. Agree with me. Tell me something I didn’t know. Or did know.
<3 Agnostic in the Pews
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)